Author
Listed:
- Lisa Dilling
(University of Colorado Boulder, Environmental Studies Program, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
University of Colorado Boulder, Western Water Assessment)
- Katharine C. Kelsey
(University of Colorado Boulder, Environmental Studies Program
University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Biological Sciences)
- Daniel P. Fernandez
(University of Colorado Boulder, Environmental Studies Program)
- Yin D. Huang
(University of Colorado Boulder, Environmental Studies Program)
- Jana B. Milford
(University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Mechanical Engineering)
- Jason C. Neff
(University of Colorado Boulder, Environmental Studies Program)
Abstract
Federal lands in the United States have been identified as important areas where forests could be managed to enhance carbon storage and help mitigate climate change. However, there has been little work examining the context for decision making for carbon in a multiple-use public land environment, and how science can support decision making. This case study of the San Juan National Forest and the Bureau of Land Management Tres Rios Field Office in southwestern Colorado examines whether land managers in these offices have adequate tools, information, and management flexibility to practice effective carbon stewardship. To understand how carbon was distributed on the management landscape we added a newly developed carbon map for the SJNF–TRFO area based on Landsat TM texture information (Kelsey and Neff in Remote Sens 6:6407–6422. doi: 10.3390/rs6076407 , 2014). We estimate that only about 22 % of the aboveground carbon in the SJNF–TRFO is in areas designated for active management, whereas about 38 % is in areas with limited management opportunities, and 29 % is in areas where natural processes should dominate. To project the effects of forest management actions on carbon storage, staff of the SJNF are expected to use the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) and extensions. While identifying FVS as the best tool generally available for this purpose, the users and developers we interviewed highlighted the limitations of applying an empirically based model over long time horizons. Future research to improve information on carbon storage should focus on locations and types of vegetation where carbon management is feasible and aligns with other management priorities.
Suggested Citation
Lisa Dilling & Katharine C. Kelsey & Daniel P. Fernandez & Yin D. Huang & Jana B. Milford & Jason C. Neff, 2016.
"Managing Carbon on Federal Public Lands: Opportunities and Challenges in Southwestern Colorado,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 283-296, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0714-2
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0714-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0714-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.