Author
Listed:
- Michael Kiparsky
(University of California, Wheeler Water Institute, School of Law
National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt))
- Barton H. Thompson Jr.
(Stanford University, Stanford Law School and Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt))
- Christian Binz
(Harvard Kennedy School of Government
National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt))
- David L. Sedlak
(University of California, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt))
- Lars Tummers
(Utrecht University, Utrecht School of Governance
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Public Administration)
- Bernhard Truffer
(Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Environmental Social Science Department
University of Utrecht, Faculty of Geosciences
National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt))
Abstract
In many regions of the world, urban water systems will need to transition into fundamentally different forms to address current stressors and meet impending challenges—faster innovation will need to be part of these transitions. To assess the innovation deficit in urban water organizations and to identify means for supporting innovation, we surveyed wastewater utility managers in California. Our results reveal insights about the attitudes towards innovation among decision makers, and how perceptions at the level of individual managers might create disincentives for experimentation. Although managers reported feeling relatively unhindered organizationally, they also spend less time on innovation than they feel they should. The most frequently reported barriers to innovation included cost and financing; risk and risk aversion; and regulatory compliance. Considering these results in the context of prior research on innovation systems, we conclude that collective action may be required to address underinvestment in innovation.
Suggested Citation
Michael Kiparsky & Barton H. Thompson Jr. & Christian Binz & David L. Sedlak & Lars Tummers & Bernhard Truffer, 2016.
"Barriers to Innovation in Urban Wastewater Utilities: Attitudes of Managers in California,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1204-1216, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0685-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0685-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0685-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.