IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v57y2016i5d10.1007_s00267-016-0671-9.html

Reservoir Sedimentation and Upstream Sediment Sources: Perspectives and Future Research Needs on Streambank and Gully Erosion

Author

Listed:
  • G. A. Fox

    (Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Water Resources Center)

  • A. Sheshukov

    (Kansas State University, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering)

  • R. Cruse

    (Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy)

  • R. L. Kolar

    (University of Oklahoma, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science)

  • L. Guertault

    (Oklahoma State University, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering)

  • K. R. Gesch

    (Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy)

  • R. C. Dutnell

    (University of Oklahoma, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science)

Abstract

The future reliance on water supply and flood control reservoirs across the globe will continue to expand, especially under a variable climate. As the inventory of new potential dam sites is shrinking, construction of additional reservoirs is less likely compared to simultaneous flow and sediment management in existing reservoirs. One aspect of this sediment management is related to the control of upstream sediment sources. However, key research questions remain regarding upstream sediment loading rates. Highlighted in this article are research needs relative to measuring and predicting sediment transport rates and loading due to streambank and gully erosion within a watershed. For example, additional instream sediment transport and reservoir sedimentation rate measurements are needed across a range of watershed conditions, reservoir sizes, and geographical locations. More research is needed to understand the intricate linkage between upland practices and instream response. A need still exists to clarify the benefit of restoration or stabilization of a small reach within a channel system or maturing gully on total watershed sediment load. We need to better understand the intricate interactions between hydrological and erosion processes to improve prediction, location, and timing of streambank erosion and failure and gully formation. Also, improved process-based measurement and prediction techniques are needed that balance data requirements regarding cohesive soil erodibility and stability as compared to simpler topographic indices for gullies or stream classification systems. Such techniques will allow the research community to address the benefit of various conservation and/or stabilization practices at targeted locations within watersheds.

Suggested Citation

  • G. A. Fox & A. Sheshukov & R. Cruse & R. L. Kolar & L. Guertault & K. R. Gesch & R. C. Dutnell, 2016. "Reservoir Sedimentation and Upstream Sediment Sources: Perspectives and Future Research Needs on Streambank and Gully Erosion," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 945-955, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0671-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0671-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0671-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0671-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0671-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.