Author
Listed:
- Ana Novoa
(Stellenbosch University, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology
Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute)
- Haylee Kaplan
(Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute)
- John R. U. Wilson
(Stellenbosch University, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology
Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute)
- David M. Richardson
(Stellenbosch University, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology)
Abstract
The regulation and management of alien species can be contentious, particularly when the stakeholders who benefit from alien species are different from those who suffer the costs. We propose a consultative process involving relevant stakeholders in invasive species management decisions. The process involves (1) the identification of relevant stakeholders, (2) assessing their perceptions, (3) enhancing interaction between stakeholders, (4) assessing changes in stakeholders’ perceptions following interactions with other stakeholders, and (5) developing management recommendations in collaboration with stakeholders. We demonstrate the application of the process using the family Cactaceae (‘cacti’) in South Africa. Many species of cacti have been introduced to the country over the past two centuries, mostly for horticulture, food and fodder, and hundreds of other species have been introduced in the past few decades (or are likely to be introduced soon) for horticulture. Using the proposed process enabled the negotiation and participation of all stakeholders in decision making and helped minimize contentious situations by clarifying stakeholder’s beliefs and exploring consensus solutions. Consequently, management objectives were broadly supported by all stakeholders. These results will be included in a national cactus management strategy for South Africa.
Suggested Citation
Ana Novoa & Haylee Kaplan & John R. U. Wilson & David M. Richardson, 2016.
"Resolving a Prickly Situation: Involving Stakeholders in Invasive Cactus Management in South Africa,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 998-1008, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0645-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0645-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0645-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.