Author
Listed:
- J. L. Seburanga
(University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology)
- E. Bizuru
(University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology)
- E. N. Mwavu
(Makerere University, Department of Forestry, Biodiversity and Tourism)
- K. G. Kampungu
(Beijing Forestry University, School of Economics and Management)
- T. Gatesire
(University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology
Karisoke Research Center, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International)
- B. A. Kaplin
(University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology
Antioch University New England, Department of Environmental Studies)
Abstract
Risk-assessment methods are useful in collecting data that can help decision making to prevent the introduction of new species that have the potential of invading as well as in management of established taxa. Not only the complexity and unaffordability of available pre-introduction risk-assessment models make them rarely or inconsistently applied in the least-developed countries, but also there is lack of tools to assess the status of already introduced plant species. In this study, an affordable and rapid method of assessment of invasiveness among introduced plant species was developed and tested in Rwanda. This method defines three invasion stages (potential, effective, and suppressive invaders) and four levels of risk assessment: post-introduction assessment of species inherent invasive potential (Level 1), post-establishment assessment of species capacity of regeneration (Level 2), post-naturalization assessment of species range of occurrence and ability for long-distance dispersal (Level 3), and post-naturalization assessment of species ability to outcompete other plants in the community and transform the landscape (Level 4). A review of invasive species in Rwanda was developed through desk review, examination of herbarium records, and vegetation surveys. This method should be applicable in other countries that lack the means for a more conventional scientific investigation or under any circumstance where a quick and inexpensive assessment is needed. The method could be useful to environmental managers for timely intervention with strategies specific to different stages of invasion (post-introduction, post-establishment, or post-naturalization) and allocate resources accordingly.
Suggested Citation
J. L. Seburanga & E. Bizuru & E. N. Mwavu & K. G. Kampungu & T. Gatesire & B. A. Kaplin, 2016.
"A New Method for Post-introduction Risk Assessment of Biological Invasions Among Introduced Shrubs in Developing Countries,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 572-584, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0639-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0639-1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0639-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.