IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v57y2016i2d10.1007_s00267-015-0607-9.html

Effects of Re-vegetation on Herbaceous Species Composition and Biological Soil Crusts Development in a Coal Mine Dumping Site

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Zhao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shapotou Desert Research and Experimental Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

  • Peng Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shapotou Desert Research and Experimental Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

  • Yigang Hu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shapotou Desert Research and Experimental Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

  • Lei Huang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shapotou Desert Research and Experimental Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

Abstract

Despite the critical roles of plant species’ diversity and biological soil crusts (BSCs) in arid and semi-arid ecosystems, the restoration of the diversity of herbaceous species and BSCs are rarely discussed during the process of vegetation restoration of anthropogenically damaged areas in these regions. In this study, the herbaceous plant species composition, along with the BSCs coverage and thicknesses, was investigated at six different re-vegetation type sites, and the natural vegetation site of the Heidaigou open pit coal mine in China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region was used as a reference. The highest total species richness (16), as well as the species richness (4.4), occurred in the Tree and Herbaceous vegetation type site. The species composition similarities between the restored sites and the reference site were shown to be very low, and ranged from 0.09 to 0.42. Also, among the restored sites, the similarities of the species were fairly high and similar, and ranged from 0.45 to 0.93. The density and height of the re-vegetated woody plants were significantly correlated with the indexes of the diversity of the species. The Shrub vegetation type site showed the greatest total coverage (80 %) of BSCs and algae crust coverage (48 %). The Shrub and Herbaceous type had the greatest thicknesses of BSCs, with as much as 3.06 mm observed, which was followed by 2.64 mm for the Shrub type. There was a significant correlation observed between the coverage of the total BSCs, and the total vegetation and herbaceous vegetation coverage, as well as between the algae crust coverage and the herbaceous vegetation coverage. It has been suggested that the re-vegetated dwarf woody plant species (such as shrubs and semi-shrubs) should be chosen for the optimal methods of the restoration of herbaceous species diversity at dumping sites, and these should be planted with low density. Furthermore, the effects of vegetation coverage on the colonization and development the BSCs should be considered in order to reconstruct the vegetation in disturbed environments, such as mine dumpsites in arid areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Zhao & Peng Zhang & Yigang Hu & Lei Huang, 2016. "Effects of Re-vegetation on Herbaceous Species Composition and Biological Soil Crusts Development in a Coal Mine Dumping Site," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 298-307, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0607-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0607-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-015-0607-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-015-0607-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:57:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0607-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.