Author
Listed:
- Niina Kotamäki
(Finnish Environment Institute)
- Anita Pätynen
(Finnish Environment Institute
University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Science)
- Antti Taskinen
(Finnish Environment Institute)
- Timo Huttula
(Finnish Environment Institute)
- Olli Malve
(Finnish Environment Institute)
Abstract
Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) has set a great challenge on river basin management planning. Assessing the water quality of lakes and coastal waters as well as setting the accepted nutrient loading levels requires appropriate decision supporting tools and models. Uncertainty that is inevitably related to the assessment results and rises from several sources calls for more precise quantification and consideration. In this study, we present a modeling tool, called lake load response (LLR), which can be used for statistical dimensioning of the nutrient loading reduction. LLR calculates the reduction that is needed to achieve good ecological status in a lake in terms of total nutrients and chlorophyll a (chl-a) concentration. We show that by combining an empirical nutrient retention model with a hierarchical chl-a model, the national lake monitoring data can be used more efficiently for predictions to a single lake. To estimate the uncertainties, we separate the residual variability and the parameter uncertainty of the modeling results with the probabilistic Bayesian modeling framework. LLR has been developed to answer the urgent need for fast and simple assessment methods, especially when implementing WFD at such an extensive scale as in Finland. With a case study for an eutrophic Finnish lake, we demonstrate how the model can be utilized to set the target loadings and to see how the uncertainties are quantified and how they are accumulating within the modeling chain.
Suggested Citation
Niina Kotamäki & Anita Pätynen & Antti Taskinen & Timo Huttula & Olli Malve, 2015.
"Statistical Dimensioning of Nutrient Loading Reduction: LLR Assessment Tool for Lake Managers,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 480-491, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:56:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0514-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0514-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:56:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0514-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.