IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v55y2015i6d10.1007_s00267-015-0475-3.html

Can a Rapid Underwater Video Approach Enhance the Benthic Assessment Capability of the National Coastal Condition Assessment in the Great Lakes?

Author

Listed:
  • Julie E. Lietz

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
    ORISE (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education) Participant)

  • John R. Kelly

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory)

  • Jill V. Scharold

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory)

  • Peder M. Yurista

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory)

Abstract

Over 400 sites were sampled in the nearshore of the U.S. Great Lakes during the U.S. National Coastal Condition Assessment (NCCA) field survey in summer 2010. Underwater video images were recorded in addition to routine NCCA benthic assessment measures. This paper has two objectives: (1) to develop a process to evaluate video performance with acceptance criteria, exploring reasons for poor images, and (2) to use acceptable videos in an example application with invasive mussels, evaluating the enhancement potential of video to supplement traditional grab sampling. A standard hierarchical protocol was developed to rank video performance based on quality and clarity. We determined controllable and uncontrollable factors affecting video performance. Moreover, specific thresholds limiting video were identified: >0.5/m for light extinction and >3.5 µg/L for chlorophyll a concentration. To demonstrate the utility and enhancement potential of video sampling, observed dreissenid presence from excellent (221 of 362 videos) videos was compared with NCCA benthic taxonomy, in the context of the statistically based NCCA survey. Including video increased the overall area estimate of the U.S. Great Lakes nearshore with invasive mussels by about 15 % compared to PONAR alone; 44 % (7570 km2) of the surveyed region had mussels. The proportion of the nearshore area having mussels varied from low (3.5 %) in Lake Superior to >50 % in the lower lakes. PONAR and video have unique strengths and weaknesses as sampling tools in the Great Lakes nearshore environment, but when paired were complimentary and thus provided a more thorough benthic condition assessment at lake and regional scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie E. Lietz & John R. Kelly & Jill V. Scharold & Peder M. Yurista, 2015. "Can a Rapid Underwater Video Approach Enhance the Benthic Assessment Capability of the National Coastal Condition Assessment in the Great Lakes?," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 1446-1456, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0475-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0475-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-015-0475-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-015-0475-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0475-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.