Author
Listed:
- Dirk J. Roux
(South African National Parks, Scientific Services
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Sustainability Research Unit)
- Richard T. Kingsford
(UNSW, Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences)
- Stephen F. McCool
(University of Montana, Department of Society and Conservation)
- Melodie A. McGeoch
(South African National Parks, Scientific Services
Monash University, School of Biological Sciences)
- Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
(South African National Parks, Scientific Services
Stellenbosch University, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology)
Abstract
Governments charge their conservation agencies to safeguard biodiversity through protected areas and threat mitigation. Increasingly, conservation management and policy need to be supported by rigorous evidence provided by science. As such, institutional arrangements should consider and enable effective scientific research and information dissemination. What role can in-house agency research play in responding to this challenge? We examined the research capabilities of three conservation agencies from Australia, South Africa, and United States. Seven indicators were used to characterize the reliability and relevance of agency research. We found similarities among agencies in their patterns of peer-reviewed publication, cultures of research collaboration, and tendencies to align research with organizational objectives. Among the many and diverse activities that constitute the role of a contemporary agency researcher, we emphasize two key research dimensions: reliability, achieved through peer-reviewed research output, and relevance, achieved through active stakeholder engagement. Amid increasingly challenging realities for conservation of ecosystems, agency science functions are vital to providing the evidence base required for effective management and policy development.
Suggested Citation
Dirk J. Roux & Richard T. Kingsford & Stephen F. McCool & Melodie A. McGeoch & Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, 2015.
"The Role and Value of Conservation Agency Research,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 1232-1245, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0473-5
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0473-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-015-0473-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.