Author
Listed:
- Arnaud Monty
(Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Department Biosystem Engineering (BIOSE), Biodiversity and Landscape)
- Marie Eugène
(Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Department Biosystem Engineering (BIOSE), Biodiversity and Landscape)
- Grégory Mahy
(Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Department Biosystem Engineering (BIOSE), Biodiversity and Landscape)
Abstract
Vegetation management often involves shredding to dispose of cut plant material or to destroy the vegetation itself. In the case of invasive plants, this can represent an environmental risk if the shredded material exhibits vegetative regeneration capacities. We tested the effect of shredding on aboveground and below-ground vegetative material of five ornamental widespread invaders in Western Europe that are likely to be managed by cutting and shredding techniques: Buddleja davidii (butterfly bush, Scrophulariaceae), Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed, Polygonaceae), Spiraea × billardii Hérincq (Billard’s bridewort, Rosaceae), Solidago gigantea (giant goldenrod, Asteraceae), and Rhus typhina L. (staghorn sumac, Anacardiaceae). We looked at signs of vegetative regeneration and biomass production, and analyzed the data with respect to the season of plant cutting (spring vs summer), the type of plant material (aboveground vs below-ground), and the shredding treatment (shredded vs control). All species were capable of vegetative regeneration, especially the below-ground material. We found differences among species, but the regeneration potential was generally still present after shredding despite a reduction of growth rates. Although it should not be excluded in all cases (e.g., destruction of giant goldenrod and staghorn sumac aboveground material), the use of a shredder to destroy woody alien plant material cannot be considered as a general management option without significant environmental risk.
Suggested Citation
Arnaud Monty & Marie Eugène & Grégory Mahy, 2015.
"Vegetative Regeneration Capacities of Five Ornamental Plant Invaders After Shredding,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 423-430, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0398-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0398-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0398-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.