IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v55y2015i2d10.1007_s00267-014-0386-8.html

Identifying Potential Recommendation Domains for Conservation Agriculture in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Kindie Tesfaye

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Moti Jaleta

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Pradyot Jena

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

  • Munyaradzi Mutenje

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT))

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) is being promoted as an option for reducing soil degradation, conserving water, enhancing crop productivity, and maintaining yield stability. However, CA is a knowledge- and technology-intensive practice, and may not be feasible or may not perform better than conventional agriculture under all conditions and farming systems. Using high resolution (≈1 km2) biophysical and socioeconomic geospatial data, this study identified potential recommendation domains (RDs) for CA in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi. The biophysical variables used were soil texture, surface slope, and rainfall while the socioeconomic variables were market access and human and livestock population densities. Based on feasibility and comparative performance of CA over conventional agriculture, the biophysical and socioeconomic factors were first used to classify cultivated areas into three biophysical and three socioeconomic potential domains, respectively. Combinations of biophysical and socioeconomic domains were then used to develop potential RDs for CA based on adoption potential within the cultivated areas. About 39, 12, and 5 % of the cultivated areas showed high biophysical and socioeconomic potential while 50, 39, and 21 % of the cultivated areas showed high biophysical and medium socioeconomic potential for CA in Malawi, Kenya, and Ethiopia, respectively. The results indicate considerable acreages of land with high CA adoption potential in the mixed crop–livestock systems of the studied countries. However, there are large differences among countries depending on biophysical and socio-economic conditions. The information generated in this study could be used for targeting CA and prioritizing CA-related agricultural research and investment priorities in the three countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kindie Tesfaye & Moti Jaleta & Pradyot Jena & Munyaradzi Mutenje, 2015. "Identifying Potential Recommendation Domains for Conservation Agriculture in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 330-346, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0386-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0386-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-014-0386-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-014-0386-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:55:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0386-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.