IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v54y2014i3d10.1007_s00267-014-0316-9.html

Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion on the Landscape Quality of Two Biosphere Reserves in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz

    (University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Landscape Ecology and Nature Conservation)

  • Tadeusz J. Chmielewski

    (University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Landscape Ecology and Nature Conservation)

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention (2000) obligates European Union countries to identify and implement landscape quality objectives (LQOs) understood as the specification of public expectations and preferences concerning the landscape of a given area, expressed by competent public authorities. The convention emphasizes the important role of local community representatives in this field. In Poland, the implementation of the LQO concept was first undertaken in two regions with radically different landscape characteristics: (1) the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve and (2) the selected protected areas of the Roztocze–Solska Forest, nominated to the rank of a biosphere reserve. The first stage of the presented study was the recognition of public opinion on the quality of key features of landscape, based on a questionnaire (n = 470). The primary objective of the study was to provide an answer to the following questions: (1) Whether similar social expectations regarding landscape quality exist in spite of radically different landscape characteristics of the regions investigated (landscape quality is understood as spatial arrangement, scenic beauty, and lack of environmental pollution); (2) which landscape features are considered to be most preservation worthy by the representatives of both local communities; and (3) What processes or development impacts pose the greatest threat to the landscape quality of both regions according to the public opinion? The conducted comparative assessment revealed that it is possible to define a set of features fundamental to the quality of both areas and that representatives of local communities pointed out the same threats to the natural and cultural values of both regions investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Tadeusz J. Chmielewski, 2014. "Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion on the Landscape Quality of Two Biosphere Reserves in Europe," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 531-556, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:54:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0316-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0316-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-014-0316-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-014-0316-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:54:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-014-0316-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.