IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v53y2014i3d10.1007_s00267-013-0199-1.html

Investigation of Biogeochemical Functional Proxies in Headwater Streams Across a Range of Channel and Catchment Alterations

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob F. Berkowitz

    (US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands and Coastal Ecology Branch, Engineer Research and Development Center
    Louisiana State University, Wetland & Aquatic Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences)

  • Elizabeth A. Summers

    (US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands and Coastal Ecology Branch, Engineer Research and Development Center)

  • Chris V. Noble

    (US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands and Coastal Ecology Branch, Engineer Research and Development Center)

  • John R. White

    (Louisiana State University, Wetland & Aquatic Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences)

  • Ronald D. DeLaune

    (Louisiana State University, Wetland & Aquatic Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences)

Abstract

Historically, headwater streams received limited protection and were subjected to extensive alteration from logging, farming, mining, and development activities. Despite these alterations, headwater streams provide essential ecological functions. This study examines proxy measures of biogeochemical function across a range of catchment alterations by tracking nutrient cycling (i.e., inputs, processing, and stream loading) with leaf litter fall, leaf litter decomposition, and water quality parameters. Nutrient input and processing remained highest in second growth forests (the least altered areas within the region), while recently altered locations transported higher loads of nutrients, sediments, and conductivity. Biogeochemical functional proxies of C and N input and processing significantly, positively correlated with rapid assessment results (Pearson coefficient = 0.67–0.81; P = 0.002–0.016). Additionally, stream loading equations demonstrate that N and P transport, sediment, and specific conductivity negatively correlated with rapid assessment scores (Pearson coefficient = 0.56–0.81; P = 0.002–0.048). The observed increase in stream loading with lower rapid assessment scores indicates that catchment alterations impact stream chemistry and that rapid assessments provide useful proxy measures of function in headwater ecosystems. Significant differences in nutrient processing, stream loading, water quality, and rapid assessment results were also observed between recently altered (e.g., mined) headwater streams and older forested catchments (Mann–Whitney U = 24; P = 0.01–0.024). Findings demonstrate that biogeochemical function is reduced in altered catchments, and rapid assessment scores respond to a combination of alteration type and recovery time. An analysis examining time and economic requirements of proxy measurements highlights the benefits of rapid assessment methods in evaluating biogeochemical functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob F. Berkowitz & Elizabeth A. Summers & Chris V. Noble & John R. White & Ronald D. DeLaune, 2014. "Investigation of Biogeochemical Functional Proxies in Headwater Streams Across a Range of Channel and Catchment Alterations," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 534-548, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:53:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0199-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0199-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-013-0199-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-013-0199-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:53:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0199-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.