IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v52y2013i4d10.1007_s00267-013-0136-3.html

Simulation of Potential Oyster Density with Variable Freshwater Inflow (1965–2000) to the Caloosahatchee River Estuary, Southwest Florida, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Buzzelli

    (South Florida Water Management District, Coastal Ecosystems Section, Applied Sciences Bureau)

  • Peter H. Doering

    (South Florida Water Management District, Coastal Ecosystems Section, Applied Sciences Bureau)

  • Yongshan Wan

    (South Florida Water Management District, Coastal Ecosystems Section, Applied Sciences Bureau)

  • Patricia Gorman

    (South Florida Water Management District, Coastal Ecosystems Section, Applied Sciences Bureau)

  • Aswani Volety

    (Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Marine and Ecological Sciences)

Abstract

Oyster beds are disappearing worldwide through a combination of over-harvesting, diseases, and salinity alterations in the coastal zone. Sensitivity of oysters to variable discharge and salinity is particularly acute in small sub-tropical estuaries subject to regulated freshwater releases. South Florida has sub-tropical estuaries where watershed flood control sometimes results in excessive freshwater inflow to estuaries during the wet season (May–Oct) and reduced discharge and increased salinities in the dry season (Nov–Apr). The potential to reserve freshwater accumulated during the wet season could offer the capacity to regulate freshwater at different temporal scales, thus optimizing salinity conditions for estuarine biota. The goal of this study was to use simulation modeling to explore the effects of freshwater inflows and salinity on adult oyster survival in the Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE) in southwest Florida. Water managers derived three different freshwater inflow scenarios for the CRE based on historical and modified watershed attributes for the time period of 1965–2000. Three different salinity time series were generated from the inflow scenarios at each of three sites in the lower CRE and used to conduct nine different oyster simulations. Overall, the predicted densities of adult oysters in the upstream site were 3–4 times greater in seasons that experienced reduced freshwater inflow (e.g., increased salinity) with oyster density in the lower estuary much less influenced by the inflows. Potential storage of freshwater reduced the frequency of extreme flows in the wet season and helped to maintain minimum inflow in the dry season near the estuarine mouth. Analyses of inflows indicated that discharges ranging from 0 to 1,500 cfs could promote favorable salinities of 10–25 in the lower CRE depending on wet versus dry season climatic conditions. This range of inflows is similar to that derived in other studies of the CRE and emphasizes the value of simulation models to help prescribe freshwater releases which benefit estuarine biota.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Buzzelli & Peter H. Doering & Yongshan Wan & Patricia Gorman & Aswani Volety, 2013. "Simulation of Potential Oyster Density with Variable Freshwater Inflow (1965–2000) to the Caloosahatchee River Estuary, Southwest Florida, USA," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 981-994, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:52:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0136-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0136-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-013-0136-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-013-0136-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:52:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0136-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.