Author
Listed:
- John C. Tyndall
(Iowa State University, Natural Resource Ecology and Management)
- Lisa A. Schulte
(Iowa State University, Natural Resource Ecology and Management)
- Matthew Liebman
(Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy)
- Matthew Helmers
(Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering)
Abstract
The impacts of strategically located contour prairie strips on sediment and nutrient runoff export from watersheds maintained under an annual row crop production system have been studied at a long-term research site in central Iowa. Data from 2007 to 2011 indicate that the contour prairie strips utilized within row crop-dominated landscapes have greater than proportionate and positive effects on the functioning of biophysical systems. Crop producers and land management agencies require comprehensive information about the Best Management Practices with regard to performance efficacy, operational/management parameters, and the full range of financial parameters. Here, a farm-level financial model assesses the establishment, management, and opportunity costs of contour prairie strips within cropped fields. Annualized, depending on variable opportunity costs the 15-year present value cost of utilizing contour prairie strips ranges from $590 to $865 ha−1 year−1 ($240–$350 ac−1 year−1). Expressed in the context of “treatment area” (e.g., in this study 1 ha of prairie treats 10 ha of crops), the costs of contour prairie strips can also be viewed as $59 to about $87 per treated hectare ($24–$35 ac−1). If prairie strips were under a 15-year CRP contract, total per acre cost to farmers would be reduced by over 85 %. Based on sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen export data from the related field studies and across low, medium, and high land rent scenarios, a megagram (Mg) of soil retained within the watershed costs between $7.79 and $11.46 mg−1, phosphorus retained costs between $6.97 and $10.25 kg−1, and nitrogen retained costs between $1.59 and $2.34 kg−1. Based on overall project results, contour prairie strips may well become one of the key conservation practices used to sustain US Corn Belt agriculture in the decades to come.
Suggested Citation
John C. Tyndall & Lisa A. Schulte & Matthew Liebman & Matthew Helmers, 2013.
"Field-Level Financial Assessment of Contour Prairie Strips for Enhancement of Environmental Quality,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 736-747, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:52:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0106-9
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0106-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:52:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-013-0106-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.