Author
Listed:
- Luiz Henrique Nobre Bof
(Federal University of Viçosa, Agricultural Engineering Department)
- Fernando Falco Pruski
(Federal University of Viçosa, Agricultural Engineering Department)
- Luciano Meneses Cardoso da Silva
(Setor Policial, National Water Agency)
- Flavio Justino
(Federal University of Viçosa, Agricultural Engineering Department)
Abstract
Agreement on the criteria for granting the right to use water resources between governing bodies represents a significant advance in the process of sharing water use. To aid water resource management agencies in optimizing water use, the impact of using different criteria for permitting water use in the Paracatu river basin, Brazil, was evaluated in this study. The streamflow criteria corresponding to 30 % of the annual Q7,10 (used by the governing body of Minas Gerais), 70 % of the annual Q95 (used by the governing body of the union), 30 % of the monthly Q7,10, and 70 % of the monthly Q95 were evaluated. The use of criteria based on the monthly streamflow allows for better management of water use because it allows for greater utilization of this resource in times when there is high water availability and imposes a more realistic restriction during critical periods. Substitution of the annual Q7,10 for the monthly Q7,10 significantly increases the streamflow permitted in some months, for example, from December to May. Use of the criterion of 70 % of the annual Q95 involves a high risk of drought in critical months, while the criterion of 70 % of the monthly Q95 minimizes this risk.
Suggested Citation
Luiz Henrique Nobre Bof & Fernando Falco Pruski & Luciano Meneses Cardoso da Silva & Flavio Justino, 2013.
"Analysis of Appropriate Timescales for Water Diversion Permits in Brazil,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 492-500, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:51:y:2013:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9982-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9982-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:51:y:2013:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9982-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.