IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v50y2012i2d10.1007_s00267-012-9879-5.html

Social Approval of the Community Assessment Model for Odor Dispersal: Results from a Citizen Survey

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Tyndall

    (Iowa State University, Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management)

  • Nancy Grudens-Schuck

    (Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural Education and Studies)

  • Jay D. Harmon

    (Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering)

  • Steve J. Hoff

    (Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering)

Abstract

Odors emitted from US Midwest hog production facilities present farmers, residents, and state regulatory agencies with a set of complex challenges. To predict odor exposure from multiple swine production sources simultaneously, and to determine siting recommendations for proposed new or enlarged hog facilities, researchers at Iowa State University designed the community assessment model for odor dispersion (CAM). A three-county citizen survey conducted in Iowa examined the level of hypothetical social acceptance of the modeling process, and level of trust in CAM results. While 69 % of respondents approved of modeling as a way to determine the most socially appropriate location for production sites, only 35 % would trust the results if potential odor exposure from a new facility were proposed to be built near their home. We analyzed approval of the CAM model, and level of trust, across a number of demographic, attitudinal, and belief factors regarding environmental quality and the hog industry. Overall, trust in CAM was uneven and varied across respondents. Those residents who would not trust CAM tended to be more concerned with environmental quality and less inclined to believe that the hog industry is critically important economically. Those who would not trust CAM results also had significantly more direct experience with odors. Findings point to predominantly positive, yet equivocal acceptance of CAM results among the citizenry, which is not unexpected given conflict typical of siting decisions in industry and waste disposal arenas. Recommendations are offered regarding the interaction of trust, beliefs and attitudes and the utility of CAM.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Tyndall & Nancy Grudens-Schuck & Jay D. Harmon & Steve J. Hoff, 2012. "Social Approval of the Community Assessment Model for Odor Dispersal: Results from a Citizen Survey," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 315-328, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:50:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9879-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9879-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-012-9879-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-012-9879-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:50:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9879-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.