IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v49y2012i3d10.1007_s00267-012-9809-6.html

Effects of Trampling Limitation on Coastal Dune Plant Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Santoro

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale)

  • Tommaso Jucker

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale)

  • Irene Prisco

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale)

  • Marta Carboni

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale)

  • Corrado Battisti

    (Provincia di Roma, Ufficio Conservazione della Natura)

  • Alicia T. R. Acosta

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale)

Abstract

Sandy coastlines are sensitive ecosystems where human activities can have considerable negative impacts. In particular, trampling by beach visitors is a disturbance that affects dune vegetation both at the species and community level. In this study we assess the effects of the limitation of human trampling on dune vegetation in a coastal protected area of Central Italy. We compare plant species diversity in two recently fenced sectors with that of an unfenced area (and therefore subject to human trampling) using rarefaction curves and a diversity/dominance approach during a two year study period. Our results indicate that limiting human trampling seems to be a key factor in driving changes in the plant diversity of dune systems. In 2007 the regression lines of species abundance as a function of rank showed steep slopes and high Y-intercept values in all sectors, indicating a comparable level of stress and dominance across the entire study site. On the contrary, in 2009 the regression lines of the two fenced sectors clearly diverge from that of the open sector, showing less steep slopes. This change in the slopes of the tendency lines, evidenced by the diversity/dominance diagrams and related to an increase in species diversity, suggests the recovery of plant communities in the two fences between 2007 and 2009. In general, plant communities subject to trampling tended to be poorer in species and less structured, since only dominant and tolerant plant species persisted. Furthermore, limiting trampling appears to have produced positive changes in the dune vegetation assemblage after a period of only two years. These results are encouraging for the management of coastal dune systems. They highlight how a simple and cost-effective management strategy, based on passive recovery conservation measures (i.e., fence building), can be a quick (1–2 years) and effective method for improving and safeguarding the diversity of dune plant communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Santoro & Tommaso Jucker & Irene Prisco & Marta Carboni & Corrado Battisti & Alicia T. R. Acosta, 2012. "Effects of Trampling Limitation on Coastal Dune Plant Communities," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 534-542, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:49:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9809-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9809-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-012-9809-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-012-9809-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:49:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-012-9809-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.