IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v49y2012i3d10.1007_s00267-011-9800-7.html

Understanding Factors That Influence Stakeholder Trust of Natural Resource Science and Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Gray

    (University of Hawaii, Manoa, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management)

  • Rachael Shwom

    (Rutgers University, Department of Human Ecology)

  • Rebecca Jordan

    (Rutgers University, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources)

Abstract

Building trust between resource users and natural resource institutions is essential when creating conservation policies that rely on stakeholders to be effective. Trust can enable the public and agencies to engage in cooperative behaviors toward shared goals and address shared problems. Despite the increasing attention that trust has received recently in the environmental management literature, the influence that individual cognitive and behavioral factors may play in influencing levels of trust in resource management institutions, and their associated scientific assessments, remains unclear. This paper uses the case of fisheries management in the northeast to explore the relationships between an individual’s knowledge of the resource, perceptions of resource health, and participatory experience on levels of trust. Using survey data collected from 244 avid recreational anglers in the Northeast U.S., we test these relationships using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that participation in fisheries management is associated with increased trust across all aspects of fisheries management. In addition, higher ratings of resource health by anglers are associated with higher levels of trust of state and regional institutions, but not federal institutions or scientific methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Gray & Rachael Shwom & Rebecca Jordan, 2012. "Understanding Factors That Influence Stakeholder Trust of Natural Resource Science and Institutions," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 663-674, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:49:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-011-9800-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:49:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-011-9800-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.