IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v48y2011i3d10.1007_s00267-011-9701-9.html

The Use of Recreation Planning Tools in U.S. Forest Service NEPA Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Lee K. Cerveny

    (USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station)

  • Dale J. Blahna

    (USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station)

  • Marc J. Stern

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation)

  • Michael J. Mortimer

    (National Capital Region, Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment)

  • S. Andrew Predmore

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation)

  • James Freeman

    (Phase One Consulting)

Abstract

U.S. Forest Service managers are required to incorporate social and biophysical science information in planning and environmental analysis. The use of science is mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and U.S. Forest Service planning rules. Despite the agency’s emphasis on ‘science-based’ decision-making, little is known about how science is actually used in recreation planning and management. This study investigated the perceptions of Forest Service interdisciplinary (ID) team leaders for 106 NEPA projects dealing with recreation and travel management between 2005 and 2008. Our survey data show how managers rate the importance of social and biophysical science compared to other potential ‘success factors’ in NEPA assessments. We also explore how team leaders value and use multi-disciplinary tools for recreation-related assessments. Results suggest that managers employ a variety of recreation planning tools in NEPA projects, but there appears to be no common understanding or approach for how or when these tools are incorporated. The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) was the most frequently used planning tool, but the Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) framework was the most consistently valued tool by those who used it. We recommend further evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each planning tool and future development of procedures to select appropriate planning tools for use in recreation-related NEPA assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee K. Cerveny & Dale J. Blahna & Marc J. Stern & Michael J. Mortimer & S. Andrew Predmore & James Freeman, 2011. "The Use of Recreation Planning Tools in U.S. Forest Service NEPA Assessments," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 644-657, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:48:y:2011:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-011-9701-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9701-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-011-9701-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-011-9701-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:48:y:2011:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-011-9701-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.