IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v46y2010i3d10.1007_s00267-010-9523-1.html

From Bathymetry to Bioshields: A Review of Post-Tsunami Ecological Research in India and its Implications for Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Nibedita Mukherjee

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laboratory of Plant Biology and Nature Management, Faculty of Sciences and Bio-Engineering Sciences
    Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Laboratory of Complexity and Dynamics of Tropical Systems, Département de Biologie des Organismes, Faculté des Sciences
    Indian Institute of Science, Centre for Ecological Sciences)

  • Farid Dahdouh-Guebas

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laboratory of Plant Biology and Nature Management, Faculty of Sciences and Bio-Engineering Sciences
    Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Laboratory of Complexity and Dynamics of Tropical Systems, Département de Biologie des Organismes, Faculté des Sciences)

  • Vena Kapoor

    (Nature Conservation Foundation)

  • Rohan Arthur

    (Nature Conservation Foundation)

  • Nico Koedam

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laboratory of Plant Biology and Nature Management, Faculty of Sciences and Bio-Engineering Sciences)

  • Aarthi Sridhar

    (Dakshin Foundation)

  • Kartik Shanker

    (Indian Institute of Science, Centre for Ecological Sciences
    Dakshin Foundation)

Abstract

More than half a decade has passed since the December 26th 2004 tsunami hit the Indian coast leaving a trail of ecological, economic and human destruction in its wake. We reviewed the coastal ecological research carried out in India in the light of the tsunami. In addition, we also briefly reviewed the ecological research in other tsunami affected countries in Asia namely Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand and Maldives in order to provide a broader perspective of ecological research after tsunami. A basic search in ISI Web of Knowledge using keywords “tsunami” and “India” resulted in 127 peer reviewed journal articles, of which 39 articles were pertaining to ecological sciences. In comparison, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand and Maldives had, respectively, eight, four, 21 and two articles pertaining to ecology. In India, bioshields received the major share of scientific interest (14 out of 39) while only one study (each) was dedicated to corals, seagrasses, seaweeds and meiofauna, pointing to the paucity of research attention dedicated to these critical ecosystems. We noted that very few interdisciplinary studies looked at linkages between pure/applied sciences and the social sciences in India. In addition, there appears to be little correlation between the limited research that was done and its influence on policy in India. This review points to gap areas in ecological research in India and highlights the lessons learnt from research in other tsunami-affected countries. It also provides guidance on the links between science and policy that are required for effective coastal zone management.

Suggested Citation

  • Nibedita Mukherjee & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Vena Kapoor & Rohan Arthur & Nico Koedam & Aarthi Sridhar & Kartik Shanker, 2010. "From Bathymetry to Bioshields: A Review of Post-Tsunami Ecological Research in India and its Implications for Policy," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 329-339, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:46:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-010-9523-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9523-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-010-9523-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-010-9523-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:46:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-010-9523-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.