IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v45y2010i5d10.1007_s00267-010-9458-6.html

Evaluating Conservation Program Success with Landsat and SWAT

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. White

    (USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory)

  • Daniel E. Storm

    (Biosystems Engineering, 110 Ag Hall, Oklahoma State University)

  • Philip Busteed

    (USDA-ARS, Grazinglands Research Laboratory)

  • Scott Stoodley

    (V.P. Water Resources, ENTRIX Inc.)

  • Shannon J. Phillips

    (Water Quality Division, Oklahoma Conservation Commission)

Abstract

In the United States, many state and federally funded conservation programs are required to quantify the water quality benefits resulting from their efforts. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of conservation practices subsidized by the Oklahoma Conservation Commission on phosphorus and sediment loads to Lake Wister. Conservation practices designed to increase vegetative cover in grazed pastures were evaluated using Landsat imagery and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Several vegetative indices were derived from Landsat imagery captured before and after the implementation of conservation practices. Collectively, these indicators provided an estimate of the change in vegetative soil cover attributable to conservation practices in treated fields. Field characteristics, management, and changes in vegetative cover were used in the SWAT model to simulate sediment and phosphorus losses before and after practice implementation. Overall, these conservation practices yielded a 1.9% improvement in vegetative cover and a predicted sediment load reduction of 3.5%. Changes in phosphorus load ranged from a 1.0% improvement to a 3.5% increase, depending upon initial vegetative conditions. The use of fertilizers containing phosphorus as a conservation practice in low-productivity pastures was predicted by SWAT to increase net phosphorus losses despite any improvement in vegetative cover. This combination of vegetative cover analysis and hydrologic simulation was a useful tool for evaluating the effects of conservation practices at the basin scale and may provide guidance for the selection of conservation measures subsidized in future conservation programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. White & Daniel E. Storm & Philip Busteed & Scott Stoodley & Shannon J. Phillips, 2010. "Evaluating Conservation Program Success with Landsat and SWAT," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1164-1174, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:45:y:2010:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-010-9458-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9458-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-010-9458-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-010-9458-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:45:y:2010:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-010-9458-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.