IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v43y2009i6d10.1007_s00267-009-9280-1.html

An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Jara Andreu

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications)

  • Montserrat Vilà

    (Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC))

  • Philip E. Hulme

    (Lincoln University, The Bio-Protection Research Centre)

Abstract

Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.

Suggested Citation

  • Jara Andreu & Montserrat Vilà & Philip E. Hulme, 2009. "An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 1244-1255, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:43:y:2009:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-009-9280-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9280-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-009-9280-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-009-9280-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:43:y:2009:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-009-9280-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.