IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v43y2009i3d10.1007_s00267-008-9261-9.html

A Comparison of Sampling Designs for Monitoring Recreational Trail Impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park

Author

Listed:
  • David Pettebone

    (Colorado State University, Human Dimensions of Natural Resources)

  • Peter Newman

    (Colorado State University, Human Dimensions of Natural Resources)

  • David Theobald

    (Colorado State University, Human Dimensions of Natural Resources and Natural Resource Ecology Lab)

Abstract

The dual goals of the Organic Act of 1916 and Wilderness Act of 1964 are to protect natural resources and provide quality visitor experiences. Park managers need metrics of trail conditions to protect park resources and quality of visitor experiences. A few methods of sampling design for trails have been developed. Here, we describe a relatively new method, spatially balanced sampling, and compare it to systematic sampling. We evaluated the efficiency of sampling designs to measure recreation-related impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park. This study addressed two objectives: first, it compared estimates of trail conditions from data collected from systematic versus spatially balanced sampling data; second, it examined the relationship between sampling precision and sampling efficiency. No statistically significant differences in trail condition were found between the 100-m interval and the spatially balanced datasets. The spatially balanced probability-based dataset was found to be a good estimate of trail conditions when analyses were conducted with fewer sample points. Moreover, spatially balanced probability-based sampling is flexible and allows additional sample points to be added to a sample.

Suggested Citation

  • David Pettebone & Peter Newman & David Theobald, 2009. "A Comparison of Sampling Designs for Monitoring Recreational Trail Impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 523-532, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:43:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9261-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9261-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-008-9261-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-008-9261-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:43:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9261-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.