IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v42y2008i6d10.1007_s00267-008-9214-3.html

Distribution of Economic Benefits from Ecotourism: A Case Study of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangming He

    (Michigan State University, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife)

  • Xiaodong Chen

    (Michigan State University, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife)

  • Wei Liu

    (Michigan State University, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife)

  • Scott Bearer

    (The Nature Conservancy in Pennsylvania)

  • Shiqiang Zhou

    (China’s Center for Giant Panda Research and Conservation, Wolong Nature Reserve)

  • Lily Yeqing Cheng

    (Stanford University, Earth Systems Program)

  • Hemin Zhang

    (China’s Center for Giant Panda Research and Conservation, Wolong Nature Reserve)

  • Zhiyun Ouyang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Lab of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences)

  • Jianguo Liu

    (Michigan State University, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife)

Abstract

Ecotourism is widely promoted as a conservation tool and actively practiced in protected areas worldwide. Theoretically, support for conservation from the various types of stakeholder inside and outside protected areas is maximized if stakeholders benefit proportionally to the opportunity costs they bear. The disproportional benefit distribution among stakeholders can erode their support for or lead to the failure of ecotourism and conservation. Using Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas (China) as an example, we demonstrate two types of uneven distribution of economic benefits among four major groups of stakeholders. First, a significant inequality exists between the local rural residents and the other types of stakeholder. The rural residents are the primary bearers of the cost of conservation, but the majority of economic benefits (investment, employment, and goods) in three key ecotourism sectors (infrastructural construction, hotels/restaurants, and souvenir sales) go to other stakeholders. Second, results show that the distribution of economic benefits is unequal among the rural residents inside the reserve. Most rural households that benefit from ecotourism are located near the main road and potentially have less impact on panda habitat than households far from the road and closer to panda habitats. This distribution gap is likely to discourage conservation support from the latter households, whose activities are the main forces degrading panda habitats. We suggest that the unequal distribution of the benefits from ecotourism can be lessened by enhancing local participation, increasing the use of local goods, and encouraging relocation of rural households closer to ecotourism facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangming He & Xiaodong Chen & Wei Liu & Scott Bearer & Shiqiang Zhou & Lily Yeqing Cheng & Hemin Zhang & Zhiyun Ouyang & Jianguo Liu, 2008. "Distribution of Economic Benefits from Ecotourism: A Case Study of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas in China," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1017-1025, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:42:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9214-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9214-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-008-9214-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-008-9214-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:42:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9214-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.