IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v42y2008i2d10.1007_s00267-008-9104-8.html

Users’ Perception as a Tool to Improve Urban Beach Planning and Management

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Cervantes

    (UABC, Facultad de Ciencias Marinas)

  • Ileana Espejel

    (UABC, Facultad de Ciencias)

  • Evarista Arellano

    (UABC, Facultad de Ciencias)

  • Sheila Delhumeau

    (UABC, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales)

Abstract

Four beaches that share physiographic characteristics (sandy, wide, and long) but differ in socioeconomic and cultural terms (three are located in northwestern Mexico and one in California, USA) were evaluated by beach users. Surveys (565) composed of 36 questions were handed out to beach users on weekends and holidays in 2005. The 25 questions that revealed the most information were selected by factor analysis and classified by cluster analysis. Beach users’ preferences were assigned a value by comparing the present survey results with the characteristics of an “ideal” recreational urban beach. Cluster analysis separated three groups of questions: (a) services and infrastructure, (b) recreational activities, and (c) beach conditions. Cluster linkage distance (r = 0.82, r = 0.78, r = 0.67) was used as a weight and multiplied by the value of beach descriptive factors. Mazatlán and Oceanside obtained the highest values because there are enough infrastructure and services; on the contrary, Ensenada and Rosarito were rated medium and low because infrastructure and services are lacking. The presently proposed method can contribute to improving current beach evaluations because the final score represents the beach users’ evaluation of the quality of the beach. The weight considered in the present study marks the beach users’ preferences among the studied beaches. Adding this weight to beach evaluation will contribute to more specific beach planning in which users’ perception is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Cervantes & Ileana Espejel & Evarista Arellano & Sheila Delhumeau, 2008. "Users’ Perception as a Tool to Improve Urban Beach Planning and Management," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 249-264, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:42:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9104-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9104-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-008-9104-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-008-9104-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:42:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-008-9104-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.