IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v41y2008i2d10.1007_s00267-007-9051-9.html

Sustainability Assessment of Future Scenarios: Methodology and Application to Mountain Areas of Europe

Author

Listed:
  • William R. Sheate

    (Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy)

  • Maria Rosário do Partidário

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Arquitectura)

  • Helen Byron

    (Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy
    Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, International Site Casework Officer)

  • Olivia Bina

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Arquitectura)

  • Suzan Dagg

    (Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy)

Abstract

BioScene (scenarios for reconciling biodiversity conservation with declining agriculture use in mountain areas in Europe) was a three-year project (2002–2005) funded by the European Union’s Fifth Framework Programme, and aimed to investigate the implications of agricultural restructuring and decline for biodiversity conservation in the mountain areas of Europe. The research took a case study approach to the analysis of the biodiversity processes and outcomes of different scenarios of agri-environmental change in six countries (France, Greece, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) covering the major biogeographical regions of Europe. The project was coordinated by Imperial College London, and each study area had a multidisciplinary team including ecologists and social and economic experts, which sought a comprehensive understanding of the drivers for change and their implications for sustainability. A key component was the sustainability assessment (SA) of the alternative scenarios. This article discusses the development and application of the SA methodology developed for BioScene. While the methodology was objectives-led, it was also strongly grounded in baseline ecological and socio-economic data. This article also describes the engagement of stakeholder panels in each study area and the use of causal chain analysis for understanding the likely implications for land use and biodiversity of strategic drivers of change under alternative scenarios for agriculture and rural policy and for biodiversity management. Finally, this article draws conclusions for the application of SA more widely, its use with scenarios, and the benefits of stakeholder engagement in the SA process.

Suggested Citation

  • William R. Sheate & Maria Rosário do Partidário & Helen Byron & Olivia Bina & Suzan Dagg, 2008. "Sustainability Assessment of Future Scenarios: Methodology and Application to Mountain Areas of Europe," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 282-299, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:41:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-007-9051-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-007-9051-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-007-9051-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-007-9051-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:41:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-007-9051-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.