Author
Listed:
- Daniel S. Cohan
(Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division
Rice University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- James W. Boylan
(Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division)
- Amit Marmur
(Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division)
- Maudood N. Khan
(Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division)
Abstract
Air protection agencies in the United States increasingly confront non-attainment of air quality standards for multiple pollutants sharing interrelated emission origins. Traditional approaches to attainment planning face important limitations that are magnified in the multipollutant context. Recognizing those limitations, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division has adopted an integrated framework to address ozone, fine particulate matter, and regional haze in the state. Rather than applying atmospheric modeling merely as a final check of an overall strategy, photochemical sensitivity analysis is conducted upfront to compare the effectiveness of controlling various precursor emission species and source regions. Emerging software enables the modeling of health benefits and associated economic valuations resulting from air pollution control. Photochemical sensitivity and health benefits analyses, applied together with traditional cost and feasibility assessments, provide a more comprehensive characterization of the implications of various control options. The fuller characterization both informs the selection of control options and facilitates the communication of impacts to affected stakeholders and the public. Although the integrated framework represents a clear improvement over previous attainment-planning efforts, key remaining shortcomings are also discussed.
Suggested Citation
Daniel S. Cohan & James W. Boylan & Amit Marmur & Maudood N. Khan, 2007.
"An Integrated Framework for Multipollutant Air Quality Management and Its Application in Georgia,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 545-554, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-006-0228-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0228-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-006-0228-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.