IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v40y2007i2d10.1007_s00267-005-0246-7.html

Conceptual Models as Hypotheses in Monitoring Urban Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Todd R. Lookingbill

    (University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Appalachian Laboratory)

  • Robert H. Gardner

    (University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Appalachian Laboratory)

  • Philip A. Townsend

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Forest Ecology and Management)

  • Shawn L. Carter

    (National Park Service, National Capital Region)

Abstract

Many problems and challenges of ecosystem management currently are driven by the rapid pace and spatial extent of landscape change. Parks and reserves within areas of high human population density are especially challenged to meet the recreational needs of local populations and to preserve valued environmental resources. The complex problem of managing multiple objectives and multiple resources requires an enormous quantity of information, and conceptual models have been proposed as tools for organizing and interpreting this information. Academics generally prefer a bottom-up approach to model construction that emphasizes ecologic theory and process, whereas managers often use a top-down approach that takes advantage of existing information to address more pragmatic objectives. The authors propose a formal process for developing, applying, and testing conceptual models to be used in landscape monitoring that reconciles these seemingly opposing perspectives. The four-step process embraces the role of hypothesis testing in the development of models and evaluation of their utility. An example application of the process to a network of national parks in and around Washington, DC illustrates the ability of the approach to systematically identify monitoring data that would both advance ecologic theory and inform management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Todd R. Lookingbill & Robert H. Gardner & Philip A. Townsend & Shawn L. Carter, 2007. "Conceptual Models as Hypotheses in Monitoring Urban Landscapes," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 171-182, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0246-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0246-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-005-0246-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-005-0246-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0246-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.