IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v40y2007i1d10.1007_s00267-006-0296-5.html

Economic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on Drinking Water Treatment and Electric Power Generation Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy A. Connelly

    (Cornell University, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources
    126 Fernow Hall, Cornell University)

  • Charles R. O’Neill Jr.

    (Cornell University, New York Sea Grant Extension, Morgan Hall, State University College)

  • Barbara A. Knuth

    (Cornell University, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources)

  • Tommy L. Brown

    (Cornell University, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources)

Abstract

Invasions of nonnative species such as zebra mussels can have both ecological and economic consequences. The economic impacts of zebra mussels have not been examined in detail since the mid-1990s. The purpose of this study was to quantify the annual and cumulative economic impact of zebra mussels on surface water-dependent drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities (where previous research indicated the greatest impacts). The study time frame was from the first full year after discovery in North America (Lake St. Clair, 1989) to the present (2004); the study area was throughout the mussels’ North American range. A mail survey resulted in a response rate of 31% for electric power companies and 41% for drinking water treatment plants. Telephone interviews with a sample of nonrespondents assessed nonresponse bias; only one difference was found and adjusted for. Over one-third (37%) of surveyed facilities reported finding zebra mussels in the facility and almost half (45%) have initiated preventive measures to prevent zebra mussels from entering the facility operations. Almost all surveyed facilities (91%) with zebra mussels have used control or mitigation alternatives to remove or control zebra mussels. We estimated that 36% of surveyed facilities experienced an economic impact. Expanding the sample to the population of the study area, we estimated $267 million (BCa 95% CI = $161 million–$467 million) in total economic costs for electric generation and water treatment facilities through late 2004, since 1989. Annual costs were greater ($44,000/facility) during the early years of zebra mussel infestation than in recent years ($30,000). As a result of this and other factors, early predictions of the ultimate costs of the zebra mussel invasion may have been excessive.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy A. Connelly & Charles R. O’Neill Jr. & Barbara A. Knuth & Tommy L. Brown, 2007. "Economic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on Drinking Water Treatment and Electric Power Generation Facilities," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 105-112, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-006-0296-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:40:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-006-0296-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.