IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v39y2007i2d10.1007_s00267-005-0368-y.html

Evaluating Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Options for Virginia

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey S. Galang

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences)

  • Carl E. Zipper

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Smyth Hall)

  • Stephen P. Prisley

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Forestry, Cheatham Hall)

  • John M. Galbraith

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Smyth Hall)

  • Patricia F. Donovan

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Smyth Hall)

Abstract

Changes in forest and agricultural land management practices have the potential to increase carbon (C) storage by terrestrial systems, thus offsetting C emissions to the atmosphere from energy production. This study assesses that potential for three terrestrial management practices within the state of Virginia, USA: afforestation of marginal agricultural lands; afforestation of riparian agricultural lands; and changing tillage practices for row crops; each was evaluated on a statewide basis and for seven regions within the state. Lands eligible for each practice were identified, and the C storage potential of each practice on those lands was estimated through a modeling procedure that utilized land-resource characteristics represented in Geographic Information System databases. Marginal agricultural lands’ afforestation was found to have the greatest potential (1.4 Tg C yr−1, on average, over the first 20 years) if applied on all eligible lands, followed by riparian afforestation (0.2 Tg C yr−1 over 20 years) and tillage conversion (0.1 Tg C yr−1 over 14 years). The regions with the largest potentials are the Ridge and Valley of western Virginia (due to extensive areas of steep, shallow soils) and in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain in eastern Virginia (wet soils). Although widespread and rapid implementation of the three modeled practices could be expected to offset only about 3.4% of Virginia’s energy-related CO2 emissions over the following 20 years (equivalent to about 8.5% of a Kyoto Treaty–based target), they could contribute to achievement of C-management goals if implemented along with other mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey S. Galang & Carl E. Zipper & Stephen P. Prisley & John M. Galbraith & Patricia F. Donovan, 2007. "Evaluating Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Options for Virginia," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 139-150, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:39:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0368-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0368-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-005-0368-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-005-0368-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:39:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0368-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.