IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v38y2006i4d10.1007_s00267-005-0108-3.html

TUGAI: An Integrated Simulation Tool for Ecological Assessment of Alternative Water Management Strategies in a Degraded River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Schlüter

    (University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research)

  • Nadja Rüger

    (University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research)

  • Andre G. Savitsky

    (Environmental Committee of Uzbekistan, Centre ‘Ecology of Water Management’)

  • Nina M. Novikova

    (Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Water Problems)

  • Michael Matthies

    (University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research)

  • Helmut Lieth

    (University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research)

Abstract

The development of ecologically sound water allocation strategies that account for the needs of riverine ecosystems is a pressing issue, especially in semiarid river basins. In the Aral Sea Basin, a search for strategies to mitigate ecological and socioeconomic deterioration has been in process since the early 1990s. The Geographic Information System–based simulation tool TUGAI has been developed to support the policy determination process by providing a simple, problem-oriented method to assess ecological effects of alternative water management strategies for the Amudarya River. It combines a multiobjective water allocation model with simple, spatially explicit statistical and rule-based models of landscape dynamics. Changes in environmental conditions are evaluated by a fuzzy habitat suitability index for Populus euphratica, which is the dominant species of the characteristic riverine Tugai forests. Water management scenarios can be developed by altering spatiotemporal water distribution in the delta area or the amount of water inflow into the delta. Outcomes of scenario analysis are qualitative comparisons of the ecological effects of different options for a time period of up to 28 years. The given approach utilizes different types of knowledge, from quantitative hydrological data to qualitative local expert knowledge. The main purpose of the tool is to integrate the knowledge in a comprehensive way to make it available for discussions on alternative policies in moderated workshops with stakeholders. In this article, the modules of the tool, their integration, and three hypothetical scenarios are presented. Based on the experience gained when developing the TUGAI tool, we propose that the general framework can be transferred to other areas where tradeoffs in water allocation between the environment and other water users are of major concern. The potential for a simulation tool to structure and inform a complex resource management situation by involving local experts and stakeholders in the development of possible future scenarios will become increasingly valuable for transparent and participatory resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Schlüter & Nadja Rüger & Andre G. Savitsky & Nina M. Novikova & Michael Matthies & Helmut Lieth, 2006. "TUGAI: An Integrated Simulation Tool for Ecological Assessment of Alternative Water Management Strategies in a Degraded River Delta," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 638-653, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:38:y:2006:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0108-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0108-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-005-0108-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-005-0108-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:38:y:2006:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-005-0108-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.