IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v36y2005i2d10.1007_s00267-004-0093-y.html

Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetlands Reserve Program in Wisconsin

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Forshay

    (University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Zoology)

  • Hem Nalini Morzaria–Luna

    (University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Botany)

  • Brack Hale

    (University of Wisconsin—Madison, Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies)

  • Katie Predick

    (University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Zoology)

Abstract

We evaluated ecological monitoring data and landowner perceptions to the federally funded Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) in a three-county region in Wisconsin. We surveyed landowner satisfaction, involvement, participation, and use of the WRP restoration sites. We found that landowners are satisfied with the overall program (mean, 3.6 ± 0.2 [SE], on a scale of 1–5, with 5 being completely satisfied). WRP restorations significantly increased the area of wetland within the sites surveyed, the increase was primarily of fresh meadow (736.32 ha after restoration). Satisfaction is related to landowner participation during restoration and to the economic incentives provided by the WRP, Landowner satisfaction and the number of plant communities after restoration are unrelated to each other or to restoration and easement costs per hectare. Survey participants recommended some changes to the WRP, including a reduction in the tax rate of land enrolled in the WRP, approval for permanent deer stands, and increased communication with WRP officials during the restoration. Monitoring information collected for WRP restoration sites does not allow assessment of whether WRP sites are functionally equivalent to natural sites. We suggest that the WRP require a more rigorous monitoring program, including guidelines for invasive species control. Managers should also encourage collaborations with external researchers and consider restorations within an experimental framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Forshay & Hem Nalini Morzaria–Luna & Brack Hale & Katie Predick, 2005. "Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetlands Reserve Program in Wisconsin," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 248-257, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:36:y:2005:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-004-0093-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0093-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-004-0093-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-004-0093-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:36:y:2005:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-004-0093-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.