IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v33y2004i5d10.1007_s00267-003-0066-6.html

Resolving Conflict and Building Cooperation in the National Estuary Program

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Lubell

    (University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, Department of Environmental Science and Policy)

Abstract

Since its beginning in 1987, researchers and policymakers have touted the US Environmental Protection Agency National Estuary program (NEP) as one of the leading examples of collaborative institutions designed to resolve conflict and build cooperation at the watershed level. Using the NEP as an example, I summarize the advantages and disadvantages of collaborative institutions. Using data gathered from focused surveys of policy elites in 22 estuaries, I estimate statistical models that show the NEP does a better job of resolving conflict and building project-level cooperation than similar estuaries without the NEP. I also describe the activities of the NEP mentioned by respondents as contributing to this outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Lubell, 2004. "Resolving Conflict and Building Cooperation in the National Estuary Program," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 677-691, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-003-0066-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0066-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-003-0066-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-003-0066-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-003-0066-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.