IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v33y2004i2d10.1007_s00267-003-3019-1.html

Attitudes Toward Wilderness Study Areas: A Survey of Six Southeastern Utah Counties

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey O. Durrant

    (Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, Department of Geography)

  • J. Matthew Shumway

    (Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, Department of Geography)

Abstract

Southeastern Utah is a region of world-renowned red-rock sandstone formations, large tracts of federal public land, rural communities centered on agriculture and extractive industries, and is often at the epicenter of environmental protection efforts in the western United States. Environmental groups have proposed formal Wilderness designations for much of the region’s public land—proposals that have been actively fought by rural community leaders who do not want large areas “locked-up” from traditional livelihood and recreational uses. The debate over wilderness designation in the region has been characterized in the media as one that is particularly contentious and polarizing. A survey of southeastern Utah residents was conducted in order to better understand this conflict. The survey focused on attitudes toward wilderness designation and management. We found that residents of southeastern Utah have negative attitudes towards the designation and management of Wilderness Study Areas. We propose that these attitudes should be carefully considered and engaged in future policy and management decisions. We suggest that negative opinions expressed by residents of southeastern Utah are not directed primarily at the concept of environmental protection but rather at the strong perception that these programs and initiatives have been carried out in a heavy-handed manner and dominated by outside influences that have overwhelmed local “voices.”

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey O. Durrant & J. Matthew Shumway, 2004. "Attitudes Toward Wilderness Study Areas: A Survey of Six Southeastern Utah Counties," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 271-283, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-003-3019-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-3019-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-003-3019-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-003-3019-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-003-3019-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.