Author
Listed:
- Susan M. Capalbo
(Montana State University, P.O. Box 172920, Bozeman, Montana 59717-2920, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics)
- John M. Antle
(Montana State University, P.O. Box 172920, Bozeman, Montana 59717-2920, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics)
- Siân Mooney
(University of Wyoming, P.O. Box 3354, Laramie, Wyoming 82071-3354, Department of Applied and Agricultural Economics)
- Keith Paustian
(Colorado State University Natural and Environmental Sciences Building, 1231 East Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1499, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory)
Abstract
Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.
Suggested Citation
Susan M. Capalbo & John M. Antle & Siân Mooney & Keith Paustian, 2004.
"Sensitivity of Carbon Sequestration Costs to Economic and Biological Uncertainties,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 238-251, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9134-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9134-1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9134-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.