Author
Listed:
- Ching-Hsun Huang
(Stephen F. Austin State University, East College at Raguet St., BOX 6109, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry)
- Richard Bates
(Stephen F. Austin State University, East College at Raguet St., BOX 6109, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry)
- Gary D. Kronrad
(Stephen F. Austin State University, East College at Raguet St., BOX 6109, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry)
- Shiaolin Cheng
(Stephen F. Austin State University, East College at Raguet St., BOX 6109, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-6109, Arthur Temple College of Forestry)
Abstract
Global concern over increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere leading to possible future climate changes have generated interest in offsetting CO2 emissions by storing carbon in forests. Carbon-sequestering forest activities may be one of the least expensive approaches to mitigate the build up of atmospheric CO2. However, the fact that forest management practices are species-, site-and management-objective-specific increases the complexity of using the forestry sector to mitigate global warming. In order to provide useful and timely information concerning carbon sequestration, this study investigated three forestry-based opportunities for sequestering carbon in the United States: conversion of marginal agricultural land to forests and reforestation of poorly stocked pine plantations in the South, afforestation of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV), and reclamation and afforestation of abandoned mined lands (AML). This study conducted economic analyses on three region–species combinations: loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the southern states, cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) in the LMAV, and northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) on AML in West Virginia. The objectives of this study were to determine the profitability of managing these three commercial tree species for timber production only and for the combination of timber production and carbon sequestration and then calculate net tonnes of carbon stored during one rotation and net revenues generated from each tonne of carbon sequestered.
Suggested Citation
Ching-Hsun Huang & Richard Bates & Gary D. Kronrad & Shiaolin Cheng, 2004.
"Economic Analyses of Sequestering Carbon in Loblolly Pine, Cherrybark Oak, and Northern Red Oak in the United States,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 187-199, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9129-y
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9129-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9129-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.