Author
Listed:
- Beyhan Y. Amichev
(Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Cheatham Hall (0324) Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, Department of Forestry)
- John M. Galbraith
(Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 239 Smyth Hall (0404) Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences Department)
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) represents the largest constituent of the global C pool and is used by researchers in C cycling, global climate change, and soil quality studies. Spatial, pedon, and soil interpretation record databases are widely used to estimate regional SOC. This study compared published SOC estimates with estimates of mass SOC to 2 m in Maine and Minnesota using STATSGO data tables edited and filled by automated software scripts. Valid STATSGO soil property data were used to produce replacement values for invalid or missing data after grouping by soil order, MLRA, layer number, and texture. Area-weighted mass SOC was calculated using log-transformed data. Between 30% and 54% of the large rock fragment data were invalid, and between 18% and 48% of the missing OM values were replaced. The log-transformed area-weighted mass SOC to 2 m was 7.88 kg/m2 (SD = 9.24 kg C/m2 CV = 117.2%) for Maine and 17.38 kg/m2 (SD = 15.30 kg C/m2 CV = 88.1%) for Minnesota. These values were lower than earlier estimates because of the log-transformation and because our error checking increased the volume of rock fragments. The FIA database was merged with STATSGO to produce mass SOC by forest-type group. The elm–ash–cottonwood (7.22 kg C/m2) and the spruce–fir (17.73 kg C/m2) forest-type groups had the highest SOC (to 1 m depth) in Maine and Minnesota, respectively. The methods and scripts used in this study can be easily adjusted, and as they are improved, they in turn can improve the quality of data in STATSGO tables.
Suggested Citation
Beyhan Y. Amichev & John M. Galbraith, 2004.
"A Revised Methodology for Estimation of Forest Soil Carbon from Spatial Soils and Forest Inventory Data Sets,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 74-86, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9119-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9119-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9119-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.