Author
Listed:
- Neal A. Scott
(P.O. Box 296 Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02536, Woods Hole Research Center)
- Charles A. Rodrigues
(Soil, and Environmental Science University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, Department of Plant)
- Holly Hughes
(P.O. Box 296 Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02536, Woods Hole Research Center)
- John T. Lee
(Soil, and Environmental Science University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, Department of Plant)
- Eric A. Davidson
(P.O. Box 296 Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02536, Woods Hole Research Center)
- D. Bryan Dail
(Soil, and Environmental Science University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, Department of Plant)
- Phil Malerba
(International Paper, Augusta, Maine 04330)
- David Y. Hollinger
(USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Durham, New Hampshire 03824)
Abstract
Although many forests are actively sequestering carbon, little research has examined the direct effects of forest management practices on carbon sequestration. At the Howland Forest in Maine, USA, we are using eddy covariance and biometric techniques to evaluate changes in carbon storage following a shelterwood cut that removed just under 30% of aboveground biomass. Prior to harvest, the stand contained about 76 Mg C/ha (30 m2/ha basal area) in aboveground and belowground live biomass. Harvesting removed about 15 Mg C/ha (SEM = 2.1) and created about 5.3 Mg C/ha (SEM = 1.1) of aboveground and 5.2 Mg C/ha (SEM = 0.7) of root/stump detritus. Leaf-area index (LAI) and litterfall declined by about 40% with harvest. Approximately half of the harvested wood was used for paper products and half for longer-lived wood products. Eddy covariance measurements in a nearby unharvested stand indicated that net ecosystem exchange (NEE) averages about 1.8 Mg C/ha/year of C sequestration. A comparison of NEE at unharvested and harvested stands, both preharvest and postharvest, indicated that NEE declined following the harvest by about 18%, which is less than expected based on basal area and LAI changes. Soil respiration declined slightly (but nonsignificantly, P = 0.23) with harvest, suggesting no major soil C loss after harvest. When decay of paper and wood products is included in a preliminary carbon budget, we calculate a postharvest net source of C to the atmosphere for at least 5 years, assuming preharvest growth rates of trees. How quickly the carbon balance becomes positive will depend largely on whether postharvest growth rates increase.
Suggested Citation
Neal A. Scott & Charles A. Rodrigues & Holly Hughes & John T. Lee & Eric A. Davidson & D. Bryan Dail & Phil Malerba & David Y. Hollinger, 2004.
"Changes in Carbon Storage and Net Carbon Exchange One Year After an Initial Shelterwood Harvest at Howland Forest, ME,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 9-22, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9114-5
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9114-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:33:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-003-9114-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.