IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v32y2003i6d10.1007_s00267-003-2684-4.html

Optimizing Liquid Effluent Monitoring at a Large Nuclear Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Charissa J. Chou

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, MSIN: K6-81, Richland, Washington 99352)

  • Vernon G. Johnson

    (Fluor Hanford Company, Richland, Washington 99352)

  • D. Brent Barnett

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, MSIN: K6-81, Richland, Washington 99352)

  • Phil M. Olson

    (Fluor Hanford Company, Richland, Washington 99352)

Abstract

Effluent monitoring typically requires a large number of analytes and samples during the initial or startup phase of a facility. Once a baseline is established, the analyte list and sampling frequency may be reduced. Although there is a large body of literature relevant to the initial design, few, if any, published papers exist on updating established effluent monitoring programs. This paper statistically evaluates four years of baseline data to optimize the liquid effluent monitoring efficiency of a centralized waste treatment and disposal facility at a large defense nuclear complex. Specific objectives were to: (1) assess temporal variability in analyte concentrations, (2) determine operational factors contributing to waste stream variability, (3) assess the probability of exceeding permit limits, and (4) streamline the sampling and analysis regime. Results indicated that the probability of exceeding permit limits was one in a million under normal facility operating conditions, sampling frequency could be reduced, and several analytes could be eliminated. Furthermore, indicators such as gross alpha and gross beta measurements could be used in lieu of more expensive specific isotopic analyses (radium, cesium-137, and strontium-90) for routine monitoring. Study results were used by the state regulatory agency to modify monitoring requirements for a new discharge permit, resulting in an annual cost savings of US $223,000. This case study demonstrates that statistical evaluation of effluent contaminant variability coupled with process knowledge can help plant managers and regulators streamline analyte lists and sampling frequencies based on detection history and environmental risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Charissa J. Chou & Vernon G. Johnson & D. Brent Barnett & Phil M. Olson, 2003. "Optimizing Liquid Effluent Monitoring at a Large Nuclear Complex," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 720-734, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-003-2684-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2684-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-003-2684-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-003-2684-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-003-2684-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.