IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v32y2003i3d10.1007_s00267-003-2993-7.html

Influence of Geoengineered Climate on the Terrestrial Biosphere

Author

Listed:
  • Vaishali Naik

    (University of Illinois, 105 S. Gregory Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Atmospheric Sciences)

  • Donald J. Wuebbles

    (University of Illinois, 105 S. Gregory Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Atmospheric Sciences)

  • Evan H. DeLucia

    (University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Plant Biology)

  • Jonathan A. Foley

    (Gaylord Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53726, Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE))

Abstract

Various geoengineering schemes have been proposed to counteract anthropogenically induced climate change. In a previous study, it was suggested that a 1.8% reduction in solar radiation incident on the Earth’s surface could noticeably reduce regional and seasonal climate change from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). However, the response of the terrestrial biosphere to reduced solar radiation in a CO2-rich climate was not investigated. In this study, we hypothesized that a reduction in incident solar radiation in a Doubled CO2 atmosphere will diminish the net primary productivity (NPP) of terrestrial ecosystems, potentially accelerating the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. We used a dynamic global ecosystem model, the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), to investigate this hypothesis in an unperturbed climatology. While this simplified modeling framework effectively separated the influence of CO2 and sunlight on the terrestrial biosphere, it did not consider the complex feedbacks within the Earth’s climate system. Our analysis indicated that compared to a Doubled CO2 scenario, reduction in incident solar radiation by 1.8% in a double CO2 world will have negligible impact on the NPP of terrestrial ecosystems. There were, however, spatial variations in the response of NPP-engineered solar radiation. While productivity decreased by less than 2% in the tropical and boreal forests as hypothesized, it increased by a similar percentage in the temperate deciduous forests and grasslands. This increase in productivity was attributed to a ∼1% reduction in evapotranspiration in the Geoengineered scenario relative to the Doubled CO2 scenario. Our initial hypothesis was rejected because of unanticipated effects of engineered solar radiation on the hydrologic cycle. However, any geoengineering approaches that reduce incident solar radiation need to be thoroughly analyzed in view of the implications on ecosystem productivity and the hydrologic cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaishali Naik & Donald J. Wuebbles & Evan H. DeLucia & Jonathan A. Foley, 2003. "Influence of Geoengineered Climate on the Terrestrial Biosphere," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 373-381, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-003-2993-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2993-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-003-2993-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-003-2993-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-003-2993-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.