IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v32y2003i1d10.1007_s00267-002-0029-3.html

Model-Based Assessment of Aspen Responses to Elk Herbivory in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. Weisberg

    (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Zentrum HG F21.5, CH-8092, Mountain Forest Ecology Group, Department of Forest Sciences)

  • Michael B. Coughenour

    (Colorado State University, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory)

Abstract

In Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP), aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) has been observed to be declining on elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) winter range for many decades. To support elk management decisions, the SAVANNA ecosystem model was adapted to explore interactions between elk herbivory and aspen dynamics. The simulated probability of successful vegetative regeneration for senescent aspen stands declines sharply when elk densities reach levels of 3–5 elk/km2, depending on model assumptions for the seasonal duration of elk foraging activities. For aspen stands with a substantial component of younger trees, the simulated regeneration probability declines more continuously with increasing elk density, dropping below 50% from densities at 8–14 elk/km2.At the landscape scale, simulated aspen regeneration probability under a scenario of extensive seasonal use was little affected by elk population level, when this level was above 300–600 elk (25%–50% current population) over the ca. 107 km2 winter range. This was because elk distribution was highly aggregated, so that a high density of elk occupied certain areas, even at low population levels overall. At approximately current elk population levels (1000–1200 elk), only 35%–45% of senescent aspen stands are simulated as having at least a 90% probability of regeneration, nearly all of them located on the periphery of the winter range. Successful management for aspen persistence on core winter range will likely require some combination of elk population reduction, management of elk distribution, and fencing to protect aspen suckers from elk browsing.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. Weisberg & Michael B. Coughenour, 2003. "Model-Based Assessment of Aspen Responses to Elk Herbivory in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 152-169, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-002-0029-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-0029-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-002-0029-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-002-0029-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:32:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-002-0029-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.