IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v31y2003i2d10.1007_s00267-002-2801-9.html

Prioritizing Wetland Restoration for Sediment Yield Reduction: A Conceptual Model

Author

Listed:
  • GEORGE VELLIDIS

    (Biological & Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia 31793-0748, USA)

  • MATT C. SMITH

    (Biological & Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia 31793-0748, USA)

  • SCOTT G. LEIBOWITZ

    (US Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA)

  • WILLIAM B. AINSLIE

    (US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Wetlands Section, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104, USA)

  • BRUCE A. PRUITT

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Ecological Assessment Branch, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, 980 College Station Rd, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA)

Abstract

In a climate of limited resources, it is often necessary to prioritize restoration efforts geographically. The synoptic approach is an ecologically based tool for geographic prioritization of wetland protection and restoration efforts. The approach was specifically designed to incorporate best professional judgment in cases where information and resources are otherwise limited. Synoptic assessments calculate indices for functional criteria in subunits (watersheds, counties, etc.) of a region and then rank the subunits. Ranks can be visualized in region-scale maps which enable managers to identify areas where efforts optimize functional performance on a regional scale. In this paper, we develop a conceptual model for prioritizing watersheds whose wetlands can be restored to reduce total sediment yield at the watershed outlet. The conceptual model is designed to rank watersheds but not individual wetlands within a watershed. The synoptic approach is valid for applying the sediment yield reduction model because there is high demand for prioritizing disturbed wetlands for restoration, but there is limited, quantitative, accurate information available with which to make decisions. Furthermore, the cost of creating a comprehensive database is prohibitively high. Finally, because the model will be used for planning purposes, and, specifically, for prioritizing based on multiple decisions rather than optimizing a single decision, the consequence of prioritization errors is low. Model results cannot be treated as scientific findings. The conclusions of an assessment are based on judgement, but this judgement is guided by scientific principles and a general understanding of relevant ecological processes. The conceptual model was developed as the first step towards prioritizing of wetland restoration for sediment yield reduction in US EPA Region 4.

Suggested Citation

  • George Vellidis & Matt C. Smith & Scott G. Leibowitz & William B. Ainslie & Bruce A. Pruitt, 2003. "Prioritizing Wetland Restoration for Sediment Yield Reduction: A Conceptual Model," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 0301-0312, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:31:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-002-2801-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2801-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-002-2801-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-002-2801-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:31:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-002-2801-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.