IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v30y2002i4d10.1007_s00267-002-2717-4.html

Section 404 Wetland Mitigation and Permit Success Criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Andrew Cole

    (Penn State University, Center for Watershed Stewardship, 227 East Calder Way, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA)

  • Deborah Shafer

    (US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180, USA)

Abstract

Twenty-three Section 404 permits in central Pennsylvania (covering a wetland age range of 1–14 years) were examined to determine the type of mitigation wetland permitted, how the sites were built, and what success criteria were used for evaluation. Most permits allowed for mitigation out-of-kind, either vegetatively or through hydrogeomorphic class. The mitigation process has resulted in a shift from impacted wetlands dominated by woody species to less vegetated mitigation wetlands, a trend that appears to be occurring nationwide. An estimate of the percent cover of emergent vegetation was the only success criterion specified in the majority of permits. About 60% of the mitigation wetlands were judged as meeting their originally defined success criteria, some after more than 10 years. The permit process appears to have resulted in a net gain of almost 0.05 ha of wetlands per mitigation project. However, due to the replacement of emergent, scrub–shrub, and forested wetlands with open water ponds or uplands, mitigation practices probably led to a net loss of vegetated wetlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Andrew Cole & Deborah Shafer, 2002. "Section 404 Wetland Mitigation and Permit Success Criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 508-515, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:30:y:2002:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-002-2717-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2717-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-002-2717-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-002-2717-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:30:y:2002:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-002-2717-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.