IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v29y2002i6d10.1007_s00267-001-2628-9.html

Inventory of Ocean Monitoring in the Southern California Bight

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth C. Schiff

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

  • Stephen B. Weisberg

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

  • Valerie Raco-Rands

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

Abstract

Monitoring of the ocean environment in southern California, USA, has been conducted by a diverse array of public and private organizations with different motivations, working on a variety of spatial and temporal scales. To create a basis from which to integrate information from these diverse programs, we conducted an inventory of ocean monitoring activities in the Southern California Bight to address the following questions: (1) How much money is being expended annually on marine monitoring programs? (2) Which organizations are conducting the most monitoring? (3) How are resources allocated among the different types of monitoring programs? This inventory focused on programs existing, or those expected to be in existence, for at least 10 years and that were active at any time between 1994 and 1997. For each program identified for inclusion in this study, information was collected on the number of sites, sampling intensity, parameters measured, and methods used. Levels of effort were translated into cost estimates based upon a market survey of local consulting firms. One hundred fourteen marine monitoring programs, conducted by 65 organizations and costing US $31 million annually, were identified. Most of the effort (81 programs, 65% of samples, 70% of costs) was expended by ocean dischargers as part of their compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. Federal programs (11 programs, 25% of samples, 10% of total expenditures) expended more than state or local government programs. More than one quarter of monitoring expenditures were conducted to measure concentrations and mass of effluent inputs to the ocean. The largest effort expended on receiving water monitoring was for measuring bacteria, followed by sediments, fish/shellfish, water quality, and intertidal habitats. The large level of expenditures by individual agencies has presented opportunities for integrating small, site-specific ocean monitoring programs into regional- and national-scale monitoring and assessment programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth C. Schiff & Stephen B. Weisberg & Valerie Raco-Rands, 2002. "Inventory of Ocean Monitoring in the Southern California Bight," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 871-876, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:29:y:2002:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-001-2628-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-2628-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-001-2628-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-001-2628-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:29:y:2002:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-001-2628-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.