Author
Listed:
- Ruud Cuperus
(Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division, P.O. Box 5044, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)
- Marleen Kalsbeek
(Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Oost-Nederland Directorate, P.O. Box 9070, 6800 ED Arnhem, The Netherlands)
- Helias A. Udo De Haes
(Leiden University, Centre of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands)
- Kees J. Canters
(Delft Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Design & Environment, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)
Abstract
First-generation compensation plans (CPs) for Dutch highway projects have been evaluated with respect to implementation of the compensation principle (1993), which aims to counterbalance the adverse ecological impacts of large-scale development projects. Decision-making on the seven projects took place between 1993 and 1995. Specifically, we considered: (a) the processes employed to prepare and implement the compensation plans; (b) the methods used to identify, plan, and execute the compensation measures; and (c) the results yielded by these methods. We conclude that the CPs were prepared fairly uniformly, particularly in terms of the processes and methodologies used to derive compensation measures. Five of the seven CPs had become operational by 2001 and initial experience is now being gained on land acquisition and transfer of compensation sites to nature conservation trusts. Further progress of CPs is likely to be seriously hampered by growing demand for land for development in general and associated increases in real estate prices. Several problems are addressed and recommendations made with respect to: (a) developing a legal basis for the compensation principle; (b) the relationship with re-allotment projects; (c) estimation of compensation costs; (d) an annual bias of CP budgets to account for rising costs; (e) contingency measures; and (f) criteria for CP (ex-post) evaluation.
Suggested Citation
Ruud Cuperus & Marleen Kalsbeek & Helias A. Udo De Haes & Kees J. Canters, 2002.
"Preparation and Implementation of Seven Ecological Compensation Plans for Dutch Highways,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 736-749, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:29:y:2002:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-001-2504-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-2504-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:29:y:2002:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-001-2504-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.