Author
Listed:
- GERARD McMAHON
(US Geological Survey, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA)
- STEVEN M. GREGONIS
(US Forest Service, Golden, Colorado 80225, USA)
- SHARON W. WALTMAN
(US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 68508, USA)
- JAMES M. OMERNIK
(US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA)
- THOR D. THORSON
(US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Portland, Oregon 97204, USA)
- JERRY A. FREEOUF
(US Forest Service, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA)
- ANDREW H. RORICK
(US Forest Service, Portland, Oregon 97055, USA)
- JAMES E. KEYS
(US Forest Service, Washington, DC 20250, USA)
Abstract
In 1996, nine federal agencies with mandates to inventory and manage the nation's land, water, and biological resources signed a memorandum of understanding entitled “Developing a Spatial Framework of Ecological Units of The United States.” This spatial framework is the basis for interagency coordination and collaboration in the development of ecosystem management strategies. One of the objectives in this memorandum is the development of a map of common ecological regions for the conterminous United States. The regions defined in the spatial framework will be areas within which biotic, abiotic, terrestrial, and aquatic capacities and potentials are similar. The agencies agreed to begin by exploring areas of agreement and disagreement in three federal natural-resource spatial frameworks—Major Land Resource Areas of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Hierarchy of Ecological Units of the USDA Forest Service, and Level III Ecoregions of the US Environmental Protection Agency. The explicit intention is that the framework will foster an ecological understanding of the landscape, rather than an understanding based on a single resource, single discipline, or single agency perspective. This paper describes the origin, capabilities, and limitations of three major federal agency frameworks and suggests why a common ecological framework is desirable. The scientific and programmatic benefits of common ecological regions are described, and a proposed process for development of the common framework is presented.
Suggested Citation
GERARD McMAHON & STEVEN M. GREGONIS & SHARON W. WALTMAN & JAMES M. OMERNIK & THOR D. THORSON & JERRY A. FREEOUF & ANDREW H. RORICK & JAMES E. KEYS, 2001.
"Developing a Spatial Framework of Common Ecological Regions for the Conterminous United States,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 293-316, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:28:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1007_s0026702429
DOI: 10.1007/s0026702429
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:28:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1007_s0026702429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.