IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v27y2001i1d10.1007_s002670010140.html

Microbiological Monitoring of Marine Recreational Waters in Southern California

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth C. Schiff

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

  • Stephen B. Weisberg

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

  • John H. Dorsey

    (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, California 92683, USA)

Abstract

An inventory was conducted to assess the number, type, spatial distribution, and costs of microbiological monitoring programs in southern California marine waters from Point Conception to the US/Mexico International Border. The location of each sampling site was determined using global positioning system (GPS), and estimates of geographic coverage were determined using geographic information system (GIS) techniques. Twenty-one programs conducted 87,007 tests annually at 576 sites in the study area. The largest number of sites was sampled in Orange County, whereas the largest number of analyses was performed in Los Angeles County because monitoring programs in this area focused on daily monitoring. Fifteen of the 21 programs were managed by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted sewage effluent dischargers who sampled both offshore and shoreline waters and typically tested for three indicator bacteria (total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus). Their combined efforts comprised 82% of all of the microbiological indicator analyses conducted on an annual basis. Five of the remaining monitoring organizations were public health agencies, which typically focus their efforts on testing only total coliforms. Laboratory methodology also varied considerably, with NPDES permittees predominantly utilizing membrane filtration while public health agencies generally used multiple tube fermentation or premanufactured test kits. Nearly three quarters of all the effort expended in southern California occurred along the shoreline as opposed to offshore locations. Two thirds of this shoreline effort was focused on high-use sandy beaches and in proximity to perennial freshwater outlets (storm drains and creeks). Most sampling occurred at a set of fixed sites that were revisited frequently, but only represented about 7% of the total shoreline. We estimated that roughly $3 million is spent annually on monitoring bathing water quality in southern California, exceeding that spent in any other part of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth C. Schiff & Stephen B. Weisberg & John H. Dorsey, 2001. "Microbiological Monitoring of Marine Recreational Waters in Southern California," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 149-157, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:27:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_s002670010140
    DOI: 10.1007/s002670010140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s002670010140
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s002670010140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:27:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_s002670010140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.