Author
Listed:
- RUUD CUPERUS
(Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division, P.O. Box 5044, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)
- MARCO M.G.J. BAKERMANS
(Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Noord-Brabant Directorate, P.O. Box 90157, 5200 MJ's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands)
- HELIAS A. UDO DE HAES
(Leiden University, Centre of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands)
- KEES J. CANTERS
(Delft University, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Design & Environment, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)
Abstract
The ecological compensation principle was introduced by the Dutch government in 1993. This principle is designed to enhance the input of nature conservation interests in decision-making on large-scale development projects and to counterbalance the ecological impacts of such developments when implemented. This article evaluates the application of the Dutch compensation principle in highway planning. Six current highway projects reveal consistent implementation of this principle, although provincial policies on compensation and a national method for identifying compensation measures are still under development. As the planning process has not yet been completed for all the projects, no general conclusions can be drawn on the impact of the compensation principle on highway decision-making. Nevertheless, several examples show that the principle stimulates project initiators to develop alternative routes or route sections in order to avoid or reduce ecological impacts and the need for coherent compensation measures. If the compensation principle is to be properly implemented in the context of highway planning, particular attention should be paid to the following aspects: (1) sequential assessment of overall project legitimacy and the necessity of intersecting protected areas and compensation measures, (2) the initiator's attempts to avoid and mitigate ecological impacts in developing alternative routes prior to compensation for impacts, and (3) the role of uncertain ecological impacts in identifying compensation measures, especially those concerning habitat isolation.
Suggested Citation
Ruud Cuperus & Marco M.G.J. Bakermans & Helias A. Udo De Haes & Kees J. Canters, 2001.
"Ecological Compensation in Dutch Highway Planning,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 75-89, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:27:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_s002670010135
DOI: 10.1007/s002670010135
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:27:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1007_s002670010135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.