Author
Listed:
- Julia Walton
(Centre for Environmental Informatics School of Sciences, University of Sunderland, Benedict Building, St. George's Way, Sunderland SR2 7BW, UK)
- Tony Alabaster
(Centre for Environmental Informatics School of Sciences, University of Sunderland, Benedict Building, St. George's Way, Sunderland SR2 7BW, UK)
- Kathryn Jones
(Centre for Environmental Informatics School of Sciences, University of Sunderland, Benedict Building, St. George's Way, Sunderland SR2 7BW, UK)
Abstract
International declarations and charters have been produced to encourage and support higher education institutions (HEIs) to address their environmental responsibilities. This paper discusses the results of a critical examination of a range of international HEIs that have signed the global environmental Talloires Declaration. It also assesses the Talloires Secretariat (University Leaders for a Sustainable Future, ULSF) and the extent to which this has been a primary stimulus. An international survey was undertaken and the results presented in a discursive format in order to highlight key driving forces, barriers, and opportunities for environmental responsibility in HEIs. Analysis reveals that they occur on two distinct and evolving levels: the macro national framework level and the micro institutional framework level. Survey responses revealed that none of the HEIs have an embedded institutional environmental culture and most did not have all the micro institutional mechanisms in place for an integrated university-wide environmental response. Many of the institutional barriers to environmental responsibility occurred as a result of this lack of strategy. The most significant institutional opportunity cited was enthusiastic individuals, particularly those at senior management or directorate level, and these individuals were found to be a key driving force. Results also showed that environmental reporting along the lines developed by the private sector is a flexible mechanism that can stimulate progress internally and externally and can be cost effectively disseminated via the World Wide Web. Moreover the survey results indicate that ULSF is not currently a primary stimulus for institution wide action.
Suggested Citation
Julia Walton & Tony Alabaster & Kathryn Jones, 2000.
"Environmental Accountability: Who's Kidding Whom?,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 515-526, November.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:26:y:2000:i:5:d:10.1007_s002670010109
DOI: 10.1007/s002670010109
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:26:y:2000:i:5:d:10.1007_s002670010109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.